Dr Roger Hodkinson - lekarz patolog (wirusolog), Cambridge University, były przewodniczący sekcji patologii stowarzyszenia lekarzy, były wykładowca na wydziale medycznym, wykładowca akademicki, egzaminator w Royal Colledge physicians w Północnej Karolinie, Prezes firmy biotechnologicznej sprzedającej testy na COVID19.
Pandemia to oszustwo.
Maseczki nieskuteczne.
Lockdown nie ma naukowego uzasadnienia.
Pozytywny wynik PCR nie potwierdza infekcji klinicznej.
Polityka udaje medycynę.

Wirusowe kłamstwa. Komu zależy na straszeniu nas przeziebieniem?

Covid to operacja wojskowa

Nowa holenderska minister zdrowia wyznaje: „Musimy wykonywać rozkazy NATO, USA i NCTV; Covid to operacja wojskowa”

Odważni eksperci z USA, Rosji i Czech mówią prawdę o szczepieniach

Premier Hiszpanii Pedro Sanchez o wojnie przeciwko Iranowi

PAKT WOJSKOWY POLSKA - IZRAEL.

Ewa Jasiewicz,Yonatan Shapira na spotkaniu w Krakowie 22 czerwca 2010

Przemoc seksualna wobec dzieci

Organizacje pedofilskie na najwyższych szczeblach władzy

Dr. Jeff Barke przerywa milczenie o COVID19

Nazwisko Horban na mapie świata

Szczepionka do zabijania Ludzi

Eksplozja nowotworów, zawałów i chorób po zastrzykach na Covid.
W dn. 8 lutego 2023 r. Dr David Martin gościł w programie 'Stew Peters Show' aby omówić niezaprzeczalny związek tzw. "szczepionek" na Covid z obserwowaną na całym świecie eksplozją nowotworów, zawałów serca i wielu innych chorób.…

więcej ->

Atak na Irak (II)

A political bombshell from Zbigniew Brzezinski
Ex-national security adviser warns that Bush is seeking a pretext to attack Iran
By Barry Grey in Washington DC
2 February 2007

Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the national security adviser in the Carter administration, delivered a scathing critique of the war in Iraq and warned that the Bush administration's policy was leading inevitably to a war with Iran, with incalculable consequences for US imperialism in the Middle East and internationally.

Brzezinski, who opposed the March 2003 invasion and has publicly denounced the war as a colossal foreign policy blunder, began his remarks on what he called the "war of choice" in Iraq by characterizing it as "a historic, strategic and moral calamity."

"Undertaken under false assumptions," he continued, "it is undermining America's global legitimacy. Its collateral civilian casualties as well as some abuses are tarnishing America's moral credentials. Driven by Manichean principles and imperial hubris, it is intensifying regional instability."

Brzezinski derided Bush's talk of a "decisive ideological struggle" against radical Islam as "simplistic and demagogic," and called it a "mythical historical narrative" employed to justify a "protracted and potentially expanding war."

"To argue that America is already at war in the region with a wider Islamic threat, of which Iran is the epicenter, is to promote a self-fulfilling prophecy," he said.

Most stunning and disturbing was his description of a "plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran." It would, he suggested, involve "Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks, followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure, then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran, culminating in a 'defensive' US military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan." [Emphasis added].

This was an unmistakable warning to the US Congress, replete with quotation marks to discount the "defensive" nature of such military action, that the Bush administration is seeking a pretext for an attack on Iran. Although he did not explicitly say so, Brzezinski came close to suggesting that the White House was capable of manufacturing a provocation—including a possible terrorist attack within the US—to provide the casus belli for war.

That a man such as Brzezinski, with decades of experience in the top echelons of the US foreign policy establishment, a man who has the closest links to the military and to intelligence agencies, should issue such a warning at an open hearing of the US Senate has immense and grave significance.

Brzezinski knows whereof he speaks, having authored provocations of his own while serving as Jimmy Carter's national security adviser. In that capacity, as he has since acknowledged in published writings, he drew up the covert plan at the end of the 1970s to mobilize Islamic fundamentalist mujaheddin to topple the pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan and draw the Soviet Union into a ruinous war in that country.

Following his opening remarks, in response to questions from the senators, Brzezinski reiterated his warning of a provocation.

He called the senators' attention to a March 27, 2006 report in the New York Times on "a private meeting between the president and Prime Minister Blair, two months before the war, based on a memorandum prepared by the British official present at this meeting." In the article, Brzezinski said, "the president is cited as saying he is concerned that there may not be weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq, and that there must be some consideration given to finding a different basis for undertaking the action."

He continued: "I'll just read you what this memo allegedly says, according to the New York Times: 'The memo states that the president and the prime minister acknowledged that no unconventional weapons had been found inside Iraq. Faced with the possibility of not finding any before the planned invasion, Mr. Bush talked about several ways to provoke a confrontation.'

"He described the several ways in which this could be done. I won't go into that... the ways were quite sensational, at least one of them.

"If one is of the view that one is dealing with an implacable enemy that has to be removed, that course of action may under certain circumstances be appealing. I'm afraid that if this situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate, and if Iran is perceived as in some fashion involved or responsible, or a potential beneficiary, that temptation could arise."

At another point Brzezinski remarked on the conspiratorial methods of the Bush administration and all but described it as a cabal. "I am perplexed," he said, "by the fact that major strategic decisions seem to be made within a very narrow circle of individuals—just a few, probably a handful, perhaps not more than the fingers on my hand. And these are the individuals, all of whom but one, who made the original decision to go to war, and used the original justifications to go to war."

None of the senators in attendance addressed themselves to the stark warning from Brzezinski. The Democrats in particular, flaccid, complacent and complicit in the war conspiracies of the Bush administration, said nothing about the danger of a provocation spelled out by the witness.

Following the hearing, this reporter asked Brzezinski directly if he was suggesting that the source of a possible provocation might be the US government itself. The former national security adviser was evasive.

The following exchange took place:

Q: Dr. Brzezinski, who do you think would be carrying out this possible provocation?

A: I have no idea. As I said, these things can never be predicted. It can be spontaneous.

Q: Are you suggesting there is a possibility it could originate within the US government itself?

A: I'm saying the whole situation can get out of hand and all sorts of calculations can produce a circumstance that would be very difficult to trace.

3 luty 2007

przesłał ICP

Dodaj komentarz

"Żydowska ucieczka do Medyny"
wrzesień 11, 2004

Skwar pó?nego lata, Skwer w Gdyni i denne swary
wrzesień 15, 2005
Mirosław Naleziński

Jak szkodliwa jest marihuana? Roczne zestawienie liczby zgonów powodowanych przez narkotyki w Ameryce
styczeń 4, 2007
Dorota

Stary Wiarus
luty 26, 2006
przeslala Elzbieta

Wojskowa dyktatura
wrzesień 4, 2003
Stanisław Tyminski

Prognoza Ataku USA na Iran
luty 27, 2007
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Ministerialni a esemesowi ćwocy
styczeń 16, 2005
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia

"Obniżka stóp byłaby nieodpowiedzialna"
lipiec 12, 2002
PAP

Wniosek
maj 4, 2004

Spor o "Wiarogodnosc Holokaustu" Ormian w latach 1914-1923
marzec 3, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Czy wydatki na wojnę w Iraku odraczają kryzys gospodarczy w USA?
wrzesień 11, 2007
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Powtórka z historii - czeka nas "narodowy socjalizm"
lipiec 26, 2004
Artur Łoboda

Pomroczność pomarańczowa
styczeń 16, 2005

Wyniki na wiare
grudzień 13, 2002
Andrzej Kumor

Przyszlosc Polski w bezpartyjnych kandydatach na wszystkie szczeble wladzy
listopad 14, 2006
Bezpartyjny

Odepchnięte dziecięcą nóżką
luty 26, 2008
Bronisław Łagowski

Michał Nowicki -O Katyniu inaczej.
styczeń 28, 2008
Michał Nowicki

Rosja i Chiny popierają Iran
czerwiec 14, 2005
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Hordy zdziczałych psów
kwiecień 1, 2006
Renata Rudecka-Kalinowska

Rozbić układ
wrzesień 3, 2007
Marek Olżyński

więcej ->

Kontakt

Atak na Irak (II)

Fundacja Promocji Kultury Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Polskie Niezależne Media

Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Polskie Niezależne Media